[People - Conquerors]

Conquerors

How long the Fifield settlement remained as a single entity is not known, but since the later Iron Age was a period of considerable unrest the group would undoubtedly have been affected by events outside their boundaries. Smaller hill forts such as Chiselbury were replaced by vast and heavily defendable regional hill forts, and these became the nuclei for settlement, grain storage and trade. Castle Ditches near Tisbury, our nearest large hill fort of this type, may well have absorbed the Fifield inhabitants as peaceful life in the smaller unit became more uncertain.

The gradual evolution of larger units led to over twenty different tribes throughout Ancient Britain. It is doubtful that there were any hard and fast boundaries however as many of these tribes were a confederation of smaller groups. As far as Fovant is concerned our ancestors would appear to come within the orbit of the Durotriges who lived in modern Somerset, Dorset and South Wiltshire. The Durotriges presented an organised society, based in the farming of lands surrounded and controlled by strong hill forts. The strongest of these hill forts, and the largest one of its kind during this period was Maiden Castle in Dorset. The site plan (click to enlarge) is shown below:

[Maiden Castle]

‘Maiden’ derives from the Celtic Mai Dun' meaning ‘great hill’

Dated artefacts from the site suggest that the construction of Maiden Castle began as far back as 3000 BC during the Neolithic period. It would seem that the site was largely deserted by 2000 BC but to have come into use again during the Iron Age. lt was during this period that the fort was massively extended. Three ditches were built, ramparts and ditches were enlarged, a wooden fence was built along the ramparts and wooden gates were installed at the entrances

The Roman invasion

Although at this time Britain was on the edge of the then known world, trading between the peoples of Britain and Europe, and indeed further afield, had long been established. Undoubtedly ideas and opinions would have been exchanged during these transactions, and almost certainly, assistance in mutually advantageous deals could have been offered and taken up by all sides. Some of these arrangements did not meet with the approval of Rome, the superpower of the time, so in 55 and 54 BC Julius Caesar sent short-lived expeditions to Britain. In either case the Romans were defeated or placated, and left our shores.

Almost a century after the Roman punitive expeditions, a well-planned invasion of Britain took place in the summer of AD43. Landing on the south coast of Britain the Romans pushed further west, eventually coming into contact with ‘our tribe’, the Durotriges, at Maiden Castle. Not surprisingly the tribe put up a fierce resistance, but it was outmatched by the 11th Augusta Legion, under the command of Vespasian, whose soldiers were finally victorious. After a few demonstrative skirmishes in the first decades of the Roman occupation, many existing tribal chiefs remained in place, but the Durotriges, like many other tribes throughout Britain at that time, eventually became Romanised and were securely included in the Roman province of Britannia.

[Romano-British settlements] After the Roman occupation, Old Sarum became a crossing point for two major roads. One route headed north of the River Nadder and thence west towards the Bath area, and the other, after crossing the River Ebble to the south, led on to the coastal area of Hamworthy. According to the Ordnance Survey map of Roman Britain, several minor occupation sites existed in the large area sandwiched between these two roads. (Click to enlarge the map on the right).

Of these sites, one noted as ‘possibly of Roman date’ was in the proximity of our future village, so settlement of a kind appears to have been in the Fovant/Sutton Mandeville area at that time.

[Roman-British bust] The discovery in 1967 of a Romano-British bust set into a wall niche in Chapel Cottage, Sutton Row, Sutton Mandeville (shown on the left), suggests a settlement of some social standing. Since the bust, thought to be a portrait, is carved in local stone, it is also reasonable to assume that local craftsmen in considerable numbers were employed.

Some smaller finds were made in the Chiselbury area and there is some suggestion that Romano-British shepherds tended their flocks on our Downs. Additionally, in the course of some construction work along the slope of Fir Hill above Dinton Road, three stone burial cists of the period were unearthed:

‘The cists had more or less collapsed over the centuries so the skeletons within were in poor condition. The only relics found were several hobnails commonly used by the Romano-British, and part of a large pot-bellied vessel of hard grey ware. One of the skeletons had a tibia broken in life and healed with a 1 inch overlap. The one good skull showed evidence of a large hooked nose and 7 remaining teeth (the rest having been lost during her rather long life). It was determined as being of a woman long past middle age with very worn teeth from eating coarse food, but they had no decay’

(from an article by G.H.Engleheart. Vol.XXXIX. WANH magazine).

It seems highly likely that these remains are of people who were residents of what would in time become the village of Fovant.

Saxons

[Fobbe] It was not until the early Middle Ages that the village in the valley really came into being. The invading Saxons, after possibly landing at Southampton Water, pushed their way west, establishing settlements in their wake. Fovant is one of the many riverside villages they founded and it is from Fobbefunta, the spring belonging to Fobbe, the Saxon name for the village, that the current name is derived.

Does the sketch on the left depict a chieftain of Fovant – or was he/she/it a deity associated with the spring?

A Saxon Land Charter of AD901concerned the lands of Fovant and Sutton Mandeville, which King Eadward granted to the thegn Wihtbrord. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines ‘thegn’ as ‘one holding land from the king by military service’, so Wihtbrord was likely to have been a soldier of some considerable rank. Apart from this second naming of a resident, the charter gave a very clear picture of land boundaries but no further mention was made of the other inhabitants of the village.

Normans

In their turn the Normans, after their invasion of 1066, were equally interested in investigating the bounds of their newly-acquired territory. Unlike the Saxons, who only listed land boundaries, the Normans also made an inventory of all the goods and chattels the land contained. Consequently, by 1087 a register listing all this information, known as the Domesday Book, was produced. Fovant has a brief mention in this book, but as far as the ordinary people were concerned the entry merely notes that Fovant has ‘ seven freed men, eight villagers and seven bordars ’.

The majority of that entry concerned the assessment of the land, rather than the people themselves. There is more discussion on this topic in the Services / Government page.

J.O.H.
January 2006

Content last updated
8 April 2006

Home | Available pages | Credits | Top of page